<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging &#38; Originality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scruffynerf.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/blogging-originality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scruffynerf.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/blogging-originality/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from a recent MLS graduate who just happens to also be a Systems Librarian</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: K.G. Schneider</title>
		<link>http://scruffynerf.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/blogging-originality/#comment-9592</link>
		<dc:creator>K.G. Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 20:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scruffynerf.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/blogging-originality/#comment-9592</guid>
		<description>If I agree with you, is that contributing to the echo chamber, or the other way around, since you're debating Rachel's point? Ouch, my head hurts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I agree with you, is that contributing to the echo chamber, or the other way around, since you&#8217;re debating Rachel&#8217;s point? Ouch, my head hurts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remaining Relevant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; S**ns, s**ns, everywhere is s**ns</title>
		<link>http://scruffynerf.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/blogging-originality/#comment-9558</link>
		<dc:creator>Remaining Relevant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; S**ns, s**ns, everywhere is s**ns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scruffynerf.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/blogging-originality/#comment-9558</guid>
		<description>[...] usually try not to participate in the library blog echo chamber too much, but I loved the idea behind effective library signs from Rochelle and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] usually try not to participate in the library blog echo chamber too much, but I loved the idea behind effective library signs from Rochelle and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://scruffynerf.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/blogging-originality/#comment-9554</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scruffynerf.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/blogging-originality/#comment-9554</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure if "inbreeding" or forms of cronyism are actually prevealent in the biblioblogosphere, but I can see how someone could come to that conclusion. The comments made by Fiona in Singer's blog seem to embody the concerns to which Singer alludes. (Personally, I would have been interested in seeing the comments made by the people who took the survey.) It's too easy to agree with someone and to write a quick "me too" posting in one's own blog; the standards are bit different for comments, though, since those should be more concise. Consequently, it also becomes too easy to tune out on a topic if too many people seem to say the same thing on multiple blogs. That's the reason why I stayed away from blogs for so long (both reading them and writing my own), and why I have a select list of bloggers who delve into issues with more nuanced thought. But then, there's that pesky confirmation bias with which to contend...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if &#8220;inbreeding&#8221; or forms of cronyism are actually prevealent in the biblioblogosphere, but I can see how someone could come to that conclusion. The comments made by Fiona in Singer&#8217;s blog seem to embody the concerns to which Singer alludes. (Personally, I would have been interested in seeing the comments made by the people who took the survey.) It&#8217;s too easy to agree with someone and to write a quick &#8220;me too&#8221; posting in one&#8217;s own blog; the standards are bit different for comments, though, since those should be more concise. Consequently, it also becomes too easy to tune out on a topic if too many people seem to say the same thing on multiple blogs. That&#8217;s the reason why I stayed away from blogs for so long (both reading them and writing my own), and why I have a select list of bloggers who delve into issues with more nuanced thought. But then, there&#8217;s that pesky confirmation bias with which to contend&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://scruffynerf.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/blogging-originality/#comment-9551</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scruffynerf.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/blogging-originality/#comment-9551</guid>
		<description>Well said! That just about echoes my own thoughts - at the risk of being me-tooey :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said! That just about echoes my own thoughts - at the risk of being me-tooey <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://scruffynerf.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/blogging-originality/#comment-9549</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scruffynerf.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/blogging-originality/#comment-9549</guid>
		<description>I don't have a problem with the apparent repetitiveness.  There isn't an abundance of "me tooism" and I like the different perspectives and the comments generated.  Given the nature of our interests, there is going to be overlap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with the apparent repetitiveness.  There isn&#8217;t an abundance of &#8220;me tooism&#8221; and I like the different perspectives and the comments generated.  Given the nature of our interests, there is going to be overlap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
