September 25, 2007
One grade down. Last night, I received an email with a grade on my first assignment – and on the first disucssion. As always, this professor has good comments to make – ones that make it apparent she has in fact read the paper that I wrote. I’m happy with the grade and am ready to really get working on the second assignment – which is due this Thursday and deals with vendors.
Meanwhile, I got absolutely no sleep last night and I am not really functioning very coherently today. ARGH!!
September 22, 2007
Yesterday, Dorothea Salo wrote a post Training-wheels culture over on her blog, Caveat Lector. Salo is tired of “. . . having to stand over a grown professional’s shoulder teaching her to use a set of essentially self-explanatory web forms because she cannot be bothered to learn by doing.” I believe that Salo’s training-wheels culture is a culture where people prefer to ask for help repeatedly rather than learn something for themselves. Now, I can’t argue that this culture exists. As a technophile, my life is filled with people who would prefer for me to show them something rather than take the time or make the effort to figure it out. This isn’t just a work thing either. It is actually much more prevalent in my personal life. Human beings are an interesting lot – and there are many, many of us who don’t feel the need to learn how to do something because we have someone close to us who knows how.
Now, I see some issues with Salo’s attitude. I will admit that I have spent a great deal of time being frustrated by technology users and their inability to grasp simple concepts. Part of what I have learned from this entire “The User is Not Broken” thing is that we need to afford the same courtesy to library employees that we afford to our patrons. Technology permeates almost everything that we do in libraries. It is essential that people who work in libraries understand a great deal about technology, understand that things will continue to change rapidly – and they need to have a basic confidence in their own knowledge of technology. This isn’t the case for so many people, and to me, it means that we are not giving people the skills they need to be successful in the library environment. Do people need to step up and take responsibility for their own skill set? No doubt about it. But, we have to work together because there is a real divide in the technological skill set. Why do people continually ask for help with something that the technology experts believe they should be able to figure out themselves? Why? We need to be looking at this rather than just getting frustrated.
Now beyond that, Dorothea Salo includes a rant about the value of cataloging. Salo read through the responses to Nicole Engard’s survey about LIS requirements and was seemingly astonished by the number of people who wrote that they believe they need additional training in cataloging. Whether you believe that MARC is dead, or should should be dead, it currently is THE foundation of our library systems. Should it be? I’m not getting into that debate. I’m not necessarily a fan of MARC, but we are a long way from saying goodbye to it. We have to deal with it. If you are going to work in a library today, you need to understand it – as well as the reasons why people believe it to be inadequate. Additionally, people can’t truly understand its weaknesses unless they first understand it. I also believe that it will be those people who understand MARC and AACR2 best who will be able to move library cataloging forward. I wasn’t surprised by how many people mentioned a need for additional training or advanced classes in cataloging. I thought it was a good thing.
Dorothea Salo’s frustration with the training-wheels culture is more than evident in this post. I’m with Salo in that we need to find a way to get people to be able to do more with technology on their own. However, I don’t think that screencasts and/or tutorials and the like are going to get us there. Nor do I think that convincing LIS students that they don’t need more training in cataloging is going to help either.
September 22, 2007
Michelle, from Yarns from M., writes:
Do you know what I think grad school does to you? I think it forces you to live, eat, breathe and sleep your chosen future profession, so that it becomes the overwhelming theme in your life and then you graduate, it falls away and you are left to wonder…well, what else should I be doing, since I’m not working in my chosen field yet?
I can second the sentiment about graduate school becoming the overwhelming theme in one’s life. I’m fortunate, very fortunate, to already have a job. I sympathize wholeheartedly with Michelle’s sentiment here, however. One eats, sleeps and breathes libraries, graduates from library school and is then at a loss because of trouble finding a job. It must be so easy to lose all of one’s excitement about working in a library. On the other hand, when one does have a full-time library job and attends library school, it almost seems as if there is never any break from libraries. I actually have to set specific boundaries and try to make sure that I have “library-free” days – days where I do not go to work, days where I do no do any homework, days where I don’t read anything library-related. I can tell you, I don’t get enough of these type of days. Fortunately, things are a bit better this semester. Taking only one class makes a big difference. However, there are many, many big projects going on at work that are making it difficult for me to let go when I leave the office. Graduate school can be a tough experience. Working in a library can be a tough experience. Doing both can be excruciating at times. I am eagerly awaiting the end of my tenure in library school, I can tell you that.
September 20, 2007
I just passed in my effort at the first assignment of the semester. The assignment was to twofold: to find a collection development policy on the web from the type of library one is specializing in and then to evaluate it according to the criteria set forth in our textbook; and to evaluate an actual policy given to us based upon collection development purposes in same textbook. How do I feel about it? Ok, I guess. I’ve taken this professor before, and I like her. I like her assignments. More importantly, I like her classes. Her assignments always tend towards the practical – and I think that is a good thing. First assignments are always nerve-wracking, and I really shouldn’t expect this one to be any different.
In terms of collection development policies, I’ve actually written one – specifically for a government documents collections (SUDOCS rule!). Was it a good one? I have no idea. However, it did get ok marks during an FDLP inspection. My problem? I did not actually want to take Collection Development. It isn’t a subject that I am interested in any way. I have no desire to take the subject lightly. It is obviously important. I’ve just developed significant interests in library systems and technology. That won’t change. So, I’m trying to make the best of this. I don’t want to suffer through this semester. I do want to learn something useful. Here’s hoping!
September 19, 2007
In honor of International Talk like a Pirate Day, I thought another web quiz was in order. I definitely couldn’t resist.
My pirate name is:
Mad Dog Kidd
Part crazy, part mangy, all rabid, you’re the pirate all the others fear might just snap soon. Even though you’re not always the traditional swaggering gallant, your steadiness and planning make you a fine, reliable pirate. Arr!
Get your own pirate name from piratequiz.com.
part of the fidius.org network
Some people’s dedication to this day is absolutely amazing. This pirate dictionary is one of me favorite finds so far.
September 18, 2007
Several weeks ago, Nicole Engard put together a survey asking MLS students and graduates about the classes that they were required to take. Today, she posted the results. They are very interesting. I wasn’t surprised by the number of current students who took the survey. Engard also had good results from those graduating between 1973 and 1999. However, not many people who graduated between 2000 and 2003 responded. I was very impressed with the number of graduates from Syracuse University – of course, that may skew the results a bit. Anyway, I definitely need to look at the results in more detail. So far, I’m not too surprised about the LIS requirments. Reference, cataloging, management and collection development seem to be the courses most often required of students.
At first, I was a bit surprised by the fact that courses on ethics didn’t seem to be required overall. However, I’m wondering if this is something that seems to get covered in other courses – and if respondents had trouble figuring out into which category their required courses fit. I can’t remember how I responded. I would consider my Foundations of Librarianship class to be the one in which we discussed such topics. Yet, I don’t see a response for an ethics class under the results for Southern Connecticut State University. I guess this means that I put Foundations of Librarianship into the Intro category??? Ahh, human confusion and error – ain’t it grand?